Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical care for pediatric patients requires high accuracy because drug dosage must be adjusted according to age, body weight, and physiological conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of compounded prescriptions for pediatric patients at Sungai Tutung Public Health Center in 2024 based on pharmaceutical aspects, particularly dosage appropriateness.


Methods: This study used a descriptive observational design with a retrospective approach. The sample consisted of 60 pediatric compounded prescriptions with 162 drug items. Data were analyzed using descriptive quantitative analysis.


Results: The results showed that 42 prescriptions, or 70.0%, were categorized as valid, while 18 prescriptions, or 30.0%, were invalid. Children aged 2–5 years were the most frequent group receiving compounded prescriptions, accounting for 56.7%. Of 162 drug items, 140 items, or 86.4%, had appropriate dosages, while 22 items, or 13.6%, were overdosed. Dosage discrepancies were found in ranitidine, chlorpheniramine maleate, and guaifenesin.


Conclusion: This study concludes that the sensuality of pediatric compounded prescriptions was generally adequate; however, improved prescription accuracy and strengthened screening by pharmaceutical personnel are still needed.

Keywords

prescription sesuaiity compounded prescription pediatric patients drug dosage medication error

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadhila, I. R., & Rahmadevi, R. (2026). THE ANALYSIS OF PHARMACEUTICAL ASPECT OF PRESCRIPTIONS FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS IN SUNGAI TUTUNG HEALTH CARE: PRESCRIPTIONS. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (IJHSRD), 8(1), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.36566/ijhsrd/Vol8.Iss1/383

References

  1. 1. Amira N.K., 2014. Hubungan Pengetahuan Tentang Antibiotik Dengan Frekuensi Penggunaan Antibiotik Tanpa Resep Dokter Pada Mahasiswa Non Medis Universitas Sebelas Maret
  2. 2. Handayani, R. S., Supardi, S., & Raharni. (2018).
  3. Peran apoteker dalam menurunkan medication error di pelayanan kesehatan. Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan, 46(3), 197–204.
  4. 3. Nisa, L. S., Siska, D., Putryanda, Y., & Noor, G. S. (2017). Pemetaan Fasilitas Kesehatan Pada Puskesmas the Mapping of Primary Health Centre’S Utilities. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 12(2), 219–229.
  5. 4. Pratiwi, R., Lestari, F., & Andayani, T. M. (2021). Kajian penggunaan obat batuk dan pilek pada pasien anak. Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian Indonesia, 19(2), 89–96.
  6. 5. Rahmi Nurhaini, Choiril Hana Mustofa, & Namira Rofi Anjani. (2023). Kajian Skrining Kelengkapan Resep Pasien Anak Rawat Jalan Di Puskesmas Jogonalan 1. CERATA Jurnal Ilmu Farmasi, 13(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.61902/cerata.v13i2.610
  7. 6. Romdhoni, M. F. 2020. Kaidah Penulisan Resep Obat. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.
  8. 7. Rahmawati, F., Handayani, R. S., & Supardi, S. (2019).
  9. Analisis kesalahan peresepan pada pasien anak di fasilitas kesehatan primer. Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia, 9(2), 123–130.
  10. 8. Sari, D. P., & Wibowo, A. (2020).
  11. Evaluasi penggunaan obat racikan pada pasien anak di puskesmas. Jurnal Farmasi Klinik Indonesia, 9(1), 45–5236
  12. 9. Sri Irmawati1, H. Sultan M., dan N. (2019). Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan di Puskesmas Kecamatan Tatanga Kota Palu. Jurnal Katalogis, 5, 188–197. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/Katalogis/article/view/7968
  13. 10. Trinovitasari, N., Ihsan, S., Hikmah, N., Malina, R., Surianti, W. O., Nazaria, S., Risnawati, R., Maladjai, D. A., & Amalia, P. Z. (2024). Evaluasi Penggunaan Obat Rasional di Puskesmas Kota Kendari: Menuju Pelayanan Kesehatan yang Lebih Baik. Lansau: Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian, 2(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.33772/lansau.v2i2.30
  14. 11. Utami, N. W., Sari, I. P., & Nugroho, A. (2022).
  15. Analisis medication error pada tahap prescribing di puskesmas. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi, 12(1), 15–22.
  16. 12. Yuliani, N., Fitriani, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2020).
  17. Evaluasi kepatuhan penulisan resep di fasilitas kesehatan tingkat pertama. Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia, 17(1), 1–8.